
Reflexive Generalized Inverse - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Sep 26, 2022 · Definition: G is a generalized inverse of A if and only if AGA=A.G is said to be reflexive if and only if GAG=G. I was trying to solve the problem: If A is a matrix and G be it's generalized …
group theory - Exercise 6.6.3 Weibel--Induced conjugation action ...
Sep 7, 2024 · This is an exercise in Weibel "Homological Algebra", chapter 6 on group cohomology. For reference, this is on Page 183. So the question was asking us to ...
Prove the centralizer of an element in group $G$ is a subgroup of $G$
Dec 7, 2011 · We have a group $G$ where $a$ is an element of $G$. Then we have a set $Z (a) = \ {g\in G : ga = ag\}$ called the centralizer of $a$. If I have an $x\in Z (a)$, how ...
Prove that $o (a)=o (gag^ {-1})$ - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Sep 20, 2015 · Your proof of the second part works perfectly, moreover, you can simply omit the reasoning $ (gag^ {-1})^2=\cdots=e$ since this is exactly what you've done in part 1.
Let $a \in G$. Show that for any $g \in G$, $gC (a)g^ {-1} = C (gag ...
Dec 5, 2018 · Try checking if the element $ghg^ {-1}$ you thought of is in $C (gag^ {-1})$ and then vice versa.
abstract algebra - Centralizer and Normalizer as Group Action ...
Jan 3, 2019 · The stabilizer subgroup we defined above for this action on some set $A\subseteq G$ is the set of all $g\in G$ such that $gAg^ {-1} = A$ — which is exactly the normalizer subgroup $N_G (A)$!
Conjugacy Classes of the Quaternion Group $Q$
Disclaimer: This is not exactly an explanation, but a relevant attempt at understanding conjugates and conjugate classes.
abstract algebra - $gAg^ {-1} \subset A$ implies $gAg^ {-1} = A ...
Jul 1, 2016 · I am trying to prove that $gAg^ {-1} \subset A$ implies $gAg^ {-1} = A$, where A is a subset of some group G, and g is a group element of G. This is stated without proof in Dummit and Foote.
Proving that $gHg^ {-1}$ is a subgroup of $G$
Jul 9, 2015 · $1) $$ (gag^ {-1})^ {-1}=g^ {-1^ {-1}}a^ {-1}g^ {-1}=ga^ {-1}g^ {-1}$ $2)$ $ ga (g^ {-1}g)bg^ {-1}=g (ab)g^ {-1}$ I'm stuck at this point, Is it correct so far? is ...
Group relations: Prove that $\forall u,v\in G$, $uv\sim vu$
Feb 24, 2020 · Prove that the relation $a\sim b$ if $b=gag^ {-1}$ for some $g\in G$, is an equivalence relation on $G$. Prove that $\forall u,v\in G$, $uv\sim vu$. So I've proved (1). My confusion lies in …